Horrible! Subbed! Classes! (2 votes per person)

[Snake]

!.Vote and explain why you don't like the subbed class.!


                                                                              !VoTe NoW!

[sevin; destroyer of worlds]

warrior priest and a monk priest.....why? cause they are completely pointless....they cant bash.....they cant cast...whats the point?

[Artiigan]

Warrior/wizard cause you can only fas, you can't bash dang

Rogue/warrior since pure warriors are better now with PF

[Snake]

I choose Warrior/Wizard because you can't really do much in this class and you are pretty weak everywhere.

I also chose Monk/Wizard because i really dont see the point in this sub... You can use gental touch to heal but wait! prizards can use ard ioc or ioc to heal! you can also dion prizards can also dion! but they have ao poison/blind and wff! prizards have prahm ao suain/poison/blind. I don't really see how this class can be very uselful. SOrry to all you Monk/wizards but yeah shizzle

[Shadow Link]

You guys obviously haven't played a basher/priest...

Think about monk/priest. With a priests max con, kicks will be pretty good, especially mantis kick. If you think about arena: WFF the opponent, if they have a DB, use Light attacks, if they're wearing a LB, bash them. Stone axe does about the same exact damage as wolf claws. Same principles apply for hunting.

The class that I'm not too fond of though, would have to be Warrior/Wizard. I have a pure wizard, and having 4 more assails won't do anything to me, except to help bash a little. I won't be able to freeze anything, so bashing would be useless. True, I can BS, but if I bash, my wizzie AC is too sucky and I'll most likely get raped. I won't have dion, which is yet another downfall. A monk/wiz would be waaay better than Warrior/wiz in my opinion.

[MeltDownZ]

wiz war and war wiz
100% usless
monkpriest owns.
i want to make a priest rouge though:P

[Shadow Link]

Wiz war isn't *too* useless. You have fas with strong bashing power, good to 2 man with any priest. Priest could MDC you, and you could even possibly attract mobs with lamhs/gar spells. Although a wiz/monk is better with their own dion, wff, forms, druid forms.

[Zeix]

Well, I'd have to say one of the worst subbed classes to probably be rogue/monks because even though they do have traps and they can use maiden but it's still 8 lines and even then they can't leech really good and all they really have is study creature and great blinds and great sleeps. Really though i'd love to hear who thinks this is useful? maybe for Shinewood leech or maybe even in cr but i can't really say it's the best sub. They are similar in the skills they get like the lore skills and they dont get any bash advantages. they won't need white bat style or cat's hearing because they have eisd creutair and hide. They will be slow starting off after being subbed as well because monks don't use alot of mp and are based mostly around con and when i had my monk i had 2k or 1k mp at level 66ish. You can't use surigums as a monk and you can't really use daggers that a rogue can to get extra bash damage, unless you make sure you never take off a dagger that you subbed with stab and twist is useless. This class is only good for the blinds and sleep snares, hide and creutair. The lore skills and maybe some gem polishing before you sub. What's the point of that?

[MeltDownZ]

Well, I'd have to say one of the worst subbed classes to probably be rogue/monks because even though they do have traps and they can use maiden but it's still 8 lines and even then they can't leech really good and all they really have is study creature and great blinds and great sleeps. Really though i'd love to hear who thinks this is useful? maybe for Shinewood leech or maybe even in cr but i can't really say it's the best sub. They are similar in the skills they get like the lore skills and they dont get any bash advantages. they won't need white bat style or cat's hearing because they have eisd creutair and hide. They will be slow starting off after being subbed as well because monks don't use alot of mp and are based mostly around con and when i had my monk i had 2k or 1k mp at level 66ish. You can't use surigums as a monk and you can't really use daggers that a rogue can to get extra bash damage, unless you make sure you never take off a dagger that you subbed with stab and twist is useless. This class is only good for the blinds and sleep snares, hide and creutair. The lore skills and maybe some gem polishing before you sub. What's the point of that?

any thing that is a rouge class other thenmouge,prouge is usless
pure rouges being the worst, then riz,then riest....

[Khiash]

rizzes aren't entirely bad, I just chose it over riest cause I wanted a decent leecher (this was before the staff of ages/brilliance was out) with 1-line, and summoners are fun.

[Zeix]

Riests are one of the better subbed classes. You can't possibly convince me otherwise. Tell me something bad about them and not their arena capabilities.

[sevin; destroyer of worlds]

well since the narf of dion they have definetly dropped in play value but still they are still pretty good. 2-maning SW/nobis isnt that bad Amusing

[Draxalos]

I choose Warrior/Wizard because you can't really do much in this class and you are pretty weak everywhere.

I also chose Monk/Wizard because i really dont see the point in this sub... You can use gental touch to heal but wait! prizards can use ard ioc or ioc to heal! you can also dion prizards can also dion! but they have ao poison/blind and wff! prizards have prahm ao suain/poison/blind. I don't really see how this class can be very uselful. SOrry to all you Monk/wizards but yeah shizzle

Monk Wizards are actually one of the coolest classes out there.  Assuming they gain all their Dugons, of course, they can one line cast a Dark elemental spell, which is the LAST thing they need.  Other than gaining all the dugons, which is a royal pain in the arse, this sub class is exactly as you described it.

I think a useless class would be Warrior subbed Wizard.  Yeah, you can bash.  Till your 70's or so.  Then you're screwed.

[Zeix]

You know what? Pure Rogues are really stupid. A GM Rogue was trying to help me in oren the other day. I was blind trapping pirates and using Spring traps and getting 2 levels so my leecher wouldn't have to do so much. You know how it is. So anyway I'am only using blind snares nothing else. She starts casting maiden in front of it, She absolutely SCREWS up my freaking line of traps and better yet I got hit by the pirate and almost died. I told her "Don't help me" and she said "FINE ;/". This is why pure rogues suck. 8 line maidens suck. Rogue/warriors are pretty useless like Rogue/monks. If they actually got something like all spells 1 line like wizards and priests subbing to other classes might be worth it. I can see a wizard/warrior being a bit useful in SW. BUT, Only with like 20k mp and a summoner to lily him and even then it has more than 1 line and thats not good in a dangerous place. Same thing goes for monks. Another useless sub is Warrior/rogue. Mostly because even though you got all those fancy bash skills and Assassin Strike. You haven't got any dion and your doomed to have to always fight with a priest. Might be sorta good for arena. Maybe.

[Shadow Link]

Rogues don't have dion in the first place, so warrior/rogue isn't too bad, unless you REALLy want Shadow Figure.

Oh, and pure rogue females tend to be somewhat annoying. Examples: Nataria, Ariss, etc.